More proof of the value of sticking to your messages
A clever contact of mine Bill Lang posted this very interesting article today about the value of sticking to core messages. It seems there is nothing wrong with being a bit of a broken record when it comes to critical messages.
From Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Series
It's Not Nagging: Why Persistent, Redundant Communication Works
April 18, 2011 Here's the executive summary
Managers who inundate their teams with the same messages, over and over, via multiple media, need not feel bad about their persistence. In fact, this redundant communication works to get projects completed quickly, according to new research by Harvard Business School professor Tsedal B. Neeleyand Northwestern University'sPaul M. Leonardi andElizabeth M. Gerber. Key concepts include:
Managers who are deliberately redundant as communicators move their projects forward more quickly and smoothly than those who are not.
Project managers lacking direct authority will work harder at communication, trying to enlist support from team members. They time first and second messages close together, typically starting with a phone call or face-to-face meeting followed up by an e-mail.
Project managers with power delay communication, typically sending an e-mail, assuming that is enough to pressure employees to do the job—only to find themselves later scrambling to do damage control.
Clarity in messaging matters less than redundancy. It's not the message; it's the frequency of the message that counts in getting the job done.
Managers with and without power met deadlines and budget goals with the same frequency, regardless of their communication strategy. But managers without power got employees to move more quickly, and with less mop up needed later. READ THE FULL ARTICLE